Utility Model Implications

The dual-access model for obtaining code roasts – staking $ROAST versus tweeting – presents an interesting dynamic. The staking option provides clear, direct utility for token holders, offering guaranteed or prioritized access. Simultaneously, the 'free' social media option acts as a built-in marketing mechanism, generating public awareness and visibility for Burnie through user engagement on platforms like Twitter. This social proof can, in turn, drive interest towards the more reliable staking pathway, creating a potentially symbiotic relationship where free engagement fuels demand for the token utility.

It is important to note that the current utility model for $ROAST focuses primarily on access to services (roasts) and events (VCC priority). This differs from other common token utilities such as direct governance rights over the protocol/agent, fee reductions, or direct revenue sharing mechanisms. Consequently, the perceived value and demand for $ROAST are heavily reliant on the quality and desirability of Burnie's code reviews and the popularity and appeal of the Vibe Coding Challenge. The project must ensure these core offerings remain compelling to sustain token utility.

Linking VCC participation priority to $ROAST staking creates a strong alignment between the most active community members (those wanting to participate in the event) and token holders . This design encourages engaged users to become stakeholders, reinforcing the connection between community activity and the token's ecosystem role, a best practice in tokenomics design.